Clearly defining the criteria for a "qualified inquiry" is both a commitment to results and a safeguard for the partnership. This article lays out the criteria and explains how to prevent fake inquiries.
In performance-based, pay-per-inquiry partnership models, the criteria for what counts as a “qualified inquiry” are critical. Clear criteria protect the interests of both parties and make results measurable and reviewable.
A qualified inquiry should be judged on four dimensions: authentic information, relevant needs, clear intent, and traceability. The key to preventing fake volume lies in authenticity verification, relevance assessment, a dispute mechanism, and transparent reconciliation. Only by using authenticity and relevance—rather than quantity—as your standard can you ensure results are real and measurable.
Usually not. Repeated inquiries from the same customer for the same need should not be billed multiple times. Deduplication should be applied during assessment to avoid charging for the same lead more than once. This is also one of the reasons the “traceability” dimension matters in qualifying inquiries.
Spam inquiries, irrelevant messages, and fake information are not counted as qualified inquiries. They’re filtered out through authenticity checks and relevance assessments. This is an important mechanism for protecting both parties’ interests and preventing inflated numbers.
A clear dispute mechanism should be established: submit a review request within an agreed timeframe (e.g., 7 days), and both parties negotiate based on the evaluation criteria. A transparent dispute mechanism is the foundation of trust in any partnership.